Legal Opinion
Inpro II Licensing, S.A.R.L. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 11, 2006No. 2005-1233PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court by Circuit Judge NEWMAN; additional views by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
Inpro II Licensing, S.A.R.L. appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, granting judgment of noninfringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,523,079 (the ’079 patent) in favor of T-Mobile USA, Inc., Research in Motion Limited, and Research in Motion Corporation (collectively “T-Mobile”). 1 The parties stipulate that the district court’s construction of certain claim terms, including the term “host interface,” preclude infringement. We hold that the district court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hill-Rom Services, Inc. v. Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Ge Lighting Solutions, LLC v. Agilight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Pacing Technologies, LLC v. Garmin International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Utto Inc. v. Metrotech Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
- In Re Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.