Legal Opinion
Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 10, 2008No. C-05-00334 RMW, C-05-02298 RMW, C-06-00244 RMWPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER FOR THE FARMWALD/HOROWITZ PATENTS AND ORDER DENYING THE MANUFACTURERS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT AND INVALIDITY DEPENDING ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
Rambus has accused the Manufactur ers 1 of infringing various patents. Largely in accord with the local rules, the parties have submitted their joint claim construction statement showing 72 claim terms in dispute. Rambus has filed its opening and responding Markman 2 briefs, motions for summary judgment of infringement, and oppositions to the Manufacturers’ motions. The…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State Oil Co. v. KhanSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Boston Scientific Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Cascadia Wildlands v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- INTERNATIONAL GAMCO, INC. v. Multimedia Games, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2010
- Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.