Legal Opinion
Verizon California Inc. v. Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 23, 2003No. 2:01-cv-09871PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order RE: Claim Construction
KLAUSNER, District Judge.
I. Background
Verizon California Inc. (“Verizon”) initiated the instant litigation seeking a declaratory judgment of patent non-infringement and invalidity as to certain patents owned by Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. (“Katz”). Katz has filed counterclaims for patent infringement against Verizon. The sixteen patents at issue in this litigation are: U.S. Patent Nos. 5,128,-984 (“the ’984 patent”); 5,351,285 (“the ’285 patent”); 5,561,707 (“the ’707 patent”); 5,684,863 (“the ’863 patent”); 5,787,156 (“the ’156 patent”); 5,815,551…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Ccs Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation and Its Division Life FitnessCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Visto Corp. v. Sproqit Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Discover Financial Services LLC v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Visto Corp. v. Sproqit Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Inventio AG v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator Americas Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
- Aptiv Technologies AG v. Microchip Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.