Legal Opinion

Gelbman v. Second National Bank

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1984No. 83-297PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue before us is whether we should impose an affirmative duty on a property owner to protect third parties from the negligent acts of business invitees which occur outside the owner’s property and are beyond the owner’s control. We decline to impose such a duty.

In Ohio it is well-established that liability in negligence will not lie in the absence of a special duty owed by the defendant. Strother v. Hutchinson (1981), 67 Ohio St. 2d 282, 285 [21 O.O.3d 177]; Feldman v. Howard (1967), 10 Ohio St. 2d 189, 193 [39 O.O.2d 228]; Kauffman v. First-Central Trust Co. (1949), 151 Ohio St. 298,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Margolin v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Feldman v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Baier v. Cleveland Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hill v. Sonitrol of Southwestern Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Littleton v. Good Samaritan Hospital & Health CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Federal Steel & Wire Corp. v. Ruhlin Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API