Legal Opinion

Hill v. Sonitrol of Southwestern Ohio, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1988No. 86-2088PublishedCited by 157 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

Appellants present the following three issues for our determination: whether a security alarm system company owes a duty of protection to the employee of a commercial establishment under a contract between the commercial establishment and the security alarm system company for the protection of the commercial establishment after it is closed for the day; whether the employee is a third-party intended beneficiary or an incidental beneficiary of the contract; and whether one who undertakes, gratuitously or for consideration, to render services to another which affect a third person is liable to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Scott & Fetzer Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Gedeon v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Mudrich v. Standard Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Norfolk & Western Company v. United States of America, and Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by157 opinions

  1. Texler v. D.O. Summers Cleaners & Shirt Laundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Brian Midkiff Monica Midkiff v. Adams County Regional Water DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Littleton v. Good Samaritan Hospital & Health CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Federal Steel & Wire Corp. v. Ruhlin Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989

152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API