Legal Opinion
Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 12, 2002No. 2000-1705PublishedCited by 164 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 95 Ohio St.3d 416.] CITY OF CINCINNATI, APPELLANT, v. BERETTA U.S.A. CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.,
2002-Ohio-2480.] Civil procedure—Court of appeals’ dismissal of complaint pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6) against handgun manufacturers, trade associations, and handgun distributor under nuisance, negligence, and product liability theories of recovery reversed and remanded to trial court, when. (No. 2000-1705—Submitted October 2, 2001—Decided June 12, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by164 opinions
- Perrysburg Township v. City of RossfordOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Gary Ex Rel. King v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Firearm CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- City of Modesto Redevelopment Agency v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Jackson v. International FiberOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.