Legal Opinion

McCallum v. McIsaac

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

The chancellor awarded a recovery upon defendant’s note of $700' given for shares of stock in the Handy Andy Community Stores of Chattanooga, Inc. He appealed and insists that the stock transaction was illegal and the note void because the agent through whom he bought the stock did not register and pay the fee as required by section 7, chapter 31, Acts 1st Ext. Ses. 1913. The defendant invokes the rule applied in Wright v. Jackson Construction Co., 138 Tenn., 145; Morton v. Imperial Realty Co., 133 Tenn., 681, and Gilley v. Harrell, 118 Tenn., 115, and insists that since the statute requires…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gilley v. HarrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Wright v. Jackson Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Cate v. CateTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Morton v. Imperial Realty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baugh v. NovakTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Vintage Health Resources, Inc. v. GuianganCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  3. Whitley v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Doherty v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
  5. Bartlett v. DohertyDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API