Legal Opinion

Hoerling v. Lowry

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1910No. 8811PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lewis county, Rice, J., entered January 26, 1910, in favor of the defendant, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, dismissing an action to cancel a deed for fraud.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Appellants, prior to May 17, 1909, were the owners of a lot in Chehalis, upon which had been erected a fourteen-room dwelling. This property was valued at about $3,000, and had a rental value of about $60 per month. On May 17, Henry Hoerling, who with his wife was a resident of Tacoma, went to Chehalis for the purpose of selling this property. He there met S. V. Lowry, a brother of the respondent, who is in the real estate business, and after some conversation is was agreed that Lowry should act as Hoer-ling’s agent in the sale of the property. Lowry finally suggested a trade of this property…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olson v. PettiboneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Johnson v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. J. C. Miller Estate, Inc. v. DruryWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Hurd v. BugnonWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Rummel v. New York Life Ins.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API