Legal Opinion

Hurd v. Bugnon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1927No. 20801. Department OnePublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This is an action for rescission on the ground of misrepresentation and fraud. Being an equitable proceeding, it was tried to the court. No findings of fact were made except such as are recited in the decree, which awarded to plaintiffs the relief sought. The defendants have appealed, assigning as error only the making of the decree granting the relief prayed for.

The chief contention seems to be that the decree is not'supported by. the evidence. The case being triable de novo here, we have studied the' evidence as disclosed by the record, with the result that, while with respect to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Samson v. BealeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. McMillen v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Hoerling v. LowryWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. J. C. Miller Estate, Inc. v. DruryWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Mason v. BurnettWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rummel v. New York Life Ins.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API