Legal Opinion
Duggal v. G.E. Capital Communications Services, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 2000No. B125295, B129637PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GODOY PEREZ, J.
Plaintiffs Oliver Duggal; Starfire Financial Services, Inc.; Michael Hauser, both individually and doing business as Global-Tel; and U.S. Refill-It, doing business as Supply Distribution Network, appeal from the judgments entered for defendants AT&T Corp. and G.E. Capital Communications Services, Inc., after their demurrers to the third amended complaint were sustained without leave to amend. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
These consolidated appeals arise from the practice of reselling long-distance telephone services provided by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Day v. AT & T CORP.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Hendy v. LosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Knevelbaard Dairies v. Kraft Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Lovejoy v. AT&T CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Smith v. SBC Communications Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Johnson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Debro v. Los Angeles RaidersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.