Day v. AT & T CORP.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WALKER, J.
In this opinion we consider the viability of appellants’ claim for injunctive relief filed to prevent common carriers and retailers who sell prepaid phone cards to the public in several-minute blocks from allegedly engaging in misleading and deceptive advertising. Appellants contend that respondents have improperly failed to disclose in their advertising and packaging materials that calls made with the cards will be charged by rounding up to the next full minute, so that, for example, a call lasting one minute and one second will be debited from the card as a two-minute call.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Saunders v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Gary Davis v. Hsbc Bank Nevada, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Adams v. Northern Illinois Gas Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
- Lavie v. Procter & Gamble Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.