Legal Opinion
Debro v. Los Angeles Raiders
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 5, 2001No. A094248PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEVENS, J.
Joseph Debro appeals from a judgment following the sustaining of respondent’s demurrer to his second amended complaint without leave to amend. Debro contends the trial court erred because one of his causes of action, based on the California False Claims Act (Gov. Code, §§ 12650-12655), was not time-barred. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
I. Facts and Procedural History
On August 7, 1995, The Los Angeles Raiders (Raiders) and entities known as the East Bay Entities (the City of Oakland, the County of Alameda, the Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum Authority, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. ZamoraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- P. Victor Gonzalez v. Planned Parenthood of LaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Mills v. Forestex Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Deveny v. ENTROPIN, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Intengan v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Scott v. JPMorgan Chase BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.