Legal Opinion

SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. v. Baca

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 1983No. 82CA0450PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Sears), the petitioner, seeks review of an order of the Industrial Commission affirming the Division of Labor’s order which denied, as untimely, Sears’ request for joinder of the “subsequent injury fund” as a party to the proceedings. Sears argues that, because of certain procedural irregularities, its petition for review of this issue was filed in a timely manner. It also asserts that it has been denied due process of law by the failure of the Division of Labor and the Industrial Commission to promulgate rules governing joinder of the subsequent injury…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Subsequent Injury Fund v. PackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  2. Frontier Airlines, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City & County of Denver v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. BacaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Subsequent Injury Fund v. EhrmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Black Mountain Spruce, Inc. v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Subsequent Injury Fund v. Black Mountain Spruce, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API