Legal Opinion
Subsequent Injury Fund v. Pack
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 5, 1968No. [No. 428, September Term, 1967.]PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinan, J.
This case presents the question of whether the Subsequent Injury Fund has authority to appeal an order or an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission. Judge Sklar in the Baltimore City Court held that it did not. We affirm.
The Subsequent Injury Fund (Fund) was created by Chapter 809 of the Acts of Maryland 1963, codified as Code (1957) Art. 101, § 66 (1964 Repl. Vol.). Its purpose was to persuade the employer to employ the handicapped individual by limiting the liability, which the employer may otherwise have incurred, in the event the previously disabled or injured individual sustained…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Zoning Appeals v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Maryland Board of Pharmacy v. Peco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Switkes v. John McShain, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
- Board of Liquor License Commissioners v. LeoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- PRESSMAN, ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF HARRIS v. Accident FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Gisriel v. Ocean City Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Lohss and Sprenkle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Prince George's County v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Subsequent Injury Fund v. ChapmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.