Legal Opinion

Subsequent Injury Fund v. Black Mountain Spruce, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 18, 1984No. 83SC112PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOHR, Justice.

We granted certiorari to review the Colorado Court of Appeals’ decision in Black Mountain Spruce, Inc. v. Johnson, 670 P.2d 1241 (Colo.App.1983), dismissing an appeal by the Subsequent Injury Fund (SIF). We conclude that the court of appeals correctly held that the SIF is not a legal entity with the capacity to sue and be sued. Under the circumstances of this case, however, we hold that dismissal is not the appropriate remedy. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of dismissal and remand for further proceedings.

Katie Jo Johnson filed a claim for death benefits under the workers’…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. BacaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Black Mountain Spruce, Inc. v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. v. BacaColorado Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Subsequent Injury Fund v. EhrmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. World Wide Construction Services, Inc. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Michalski v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Exeter Drilling v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Knight v. Department of Natural Resources, Division of WildlifeColorado Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API