Legal Opinion
Rudin v. Luman
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 15, 1921No. Civ. No. 2255PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The plaintiffs brought this action to recover from the defendant the sum of $663.25.
The complaint is in two counts, in the first of which it is alleged that the plaintiffs rented and hired to the defendant, between the eighth day of July, 1918, and the first day of November, 1918, fourteen head of work horses, “at the agreed price and rental of seventy-five cents per day for each horse; that the said defendant received the .said horses on the eighth day of July, 1918, and used and worked them continuously for the period of time” first hereinabove mentioned, and that by reason of the use of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McGuire v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Brandt v. KroghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Wilson v. WaldronWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Francisco v. BenepeMontana Supreme Court · 1886
- Santa Cruz Rock Pavement Co. v. BowieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moss v. StubbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- De La Falaise v. Gaumont-British Picture Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Malloway v. HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Wilson v. KoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Dreyer v. CyriacksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.