Legal Opinion

Dreyer v. Cyriacks

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1931No. Docket No. 7654PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

While the plaintiff Faust, accompanied by two companions, named Richardson and Kempin, were leaving the home of the defendant Cyriacks in an automobile following a quarrel which had taken place there, Cyriacks fired three shots from a rifle at the automobile. One of the bullets embedded itself in the spare tire, another hit Kempin’s hat and the other penetrated the rear of the automobile and struck and killed a dog belonging to plaintiffs, which, unknown to Cyriacks, was riding on the rear seat with Kempin. Thereafter plaintiffs brought this action for damages for the killing of the dog and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Smith v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Gordon v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Morris v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Koyer v. McComberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Dodds v. StellarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Hughes v. Hearst Publications, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Whicker v. Crescent Auto Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API