Brandt v. Krogh
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. B. Nutter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Brandt brought this action to recover on a promissory note for the sum of $3,750, which was executed in his favor by Krogh and Abrams on the twenty-second day of October, 1904, at the city of Stockton. Said note called for interest at the rate of seven per cent per annum, and it is alleged that on the twenty-fourth day of January, 1906, the sum of $596.95 was paid on account of said note, leaving a balance due thereon of $3,524.90, for which, with interest from said twenty-fourth day of January, 1906, judgment is asked.
The defendant Abrams failed to answer the complaint, and, therefore, as to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mead v. . BunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hamm v. RomineIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Wood v. MoultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Chalmers v. SheehyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Phelps v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Winning v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. FerrellArizona Supreme Court · 1933
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.