Laufenberg v. Cosmetology Examining Board
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.
In both cases the parties filed stipulations of facts with their respective licensing boards. The result was that no hearing was held and no testimony or evidence was otherwise presented. Review on appeal is thus limited to the facts set forth in the stipulations.
In the proceeding before the Cosmetology Examining Board, Laufenberg and the board entered into the following stipulation of facts :
1. That Patricia A. Laufenberg at all times pertinent hereto is duly licensed as a cosmetologist under ch. 159 of the Wisconsin statutes.
2. That from November 29,1974, to the present (April 28, 1975),…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Pabst v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Schmidt v. Department of Local Affairs & DevelopmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Bisenius v. KarnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. La FolletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. HolmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. PopanzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. StoehrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- In Interest of Baby Girl K.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Gilbert v. State, Medical Examining BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.