Legal Opinion
J. B. Colt Co. v. Florence
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 8, 1927No. 17457PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERR, O.
The parties appear in this .court as they did in the trial court; that is, plaintiff in error was plaintiff below and defendant in error was defendant. They will be so referred to in this opinion.
Plaintiff prosecutes this action against the defendant to recover a balance due on a promissory note in the sum of $259.90, with interest at 6 per cent, from the 26th day of July, 19Qj9. Defendant answered, admitting the execution and delivery of the note, but, as a defense thereto, alleges that the consideration of said note wholly failed in that said note was given to plaintiff for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ozark States Trust Co. v. WinklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Hopkins v. City National Bank of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Hollister v. National Cash Register Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- J. B. Colt Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- White Sewing MacH. Co. v. McCarty Furn. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miller v. Troy Laundry MacHinery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Wichita Flour Mills Co. v. Guymon Equity ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Schuman v. McLainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Clayton v. PaulSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Rollison v. MuirSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.