Legal Opinion
J. B. Colt Co. v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 12, 1926No. 16130PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.
This action was commenced by the plaintiff in error, J. B. Colt Company, hereafter referred to as the plaintiff, against the defendant in erróte, Matie Thompson, hereafter referred to as the defendant, to recover $266.70, with interest, for a carbide lighting system, which was sold and delivered to the defendant for use in her home by the plaintiff under a written contrart. The contract contained no provision that said lighting system was to be installed by the plaintiff in the home of the defendant, or that it was to prove satisfactory before plaintiff was to be paid the.refor.
For answer,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- McNinch v. Northwest Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Colonial Jewelry Co. v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Ozark States Trust Co. v. WinklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- White Sewing MacH. Co. v. McCarty Furn. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miller v. Troy Laundry MacHinery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- McCubbins v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Wichita Flour Mills Co. v. Guymon Equity ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- J. B. Colt Co. v. FlorenceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Liberty Plan Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.