Legal Opinion
Rollison v. Muir
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 9, 1933No. 20783PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county canceling an option to purchase certain lots in Oklahoma City, executed by Ida Muir, plaintiff below, to J. W. Rollison, defendant below.
Plaintiff alleged in her petition that the defendant is by profession a real estate broker, conversant with the values of real estáte in Oklahoma City and with the value of the property which is the subject of this action,, and that plaintiff is inexperienced in such matters and unacquainted with such values; that plaintiff and defendant had lived in the same general vicinity, and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Daniel v. TolonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Hogan v. LeeperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Board of Trustees of Oberlin College v. BlairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
- Colonial Jewelry Co. v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sellers v. SellersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Owens v. MusselmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Blackstock Oil Co. v. CastonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- All American Bus Lines, Inc. v. SchusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Hill v. Agri-Risk ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992