Legal Opinion
Clayton v. Paul
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 17, 1956No. 36914PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORN, Justice.
The parties herein will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiff, Percy S. Paul, sought possession by replevin of certain patterns which defendant, Frank D. Clayton, Jr., allegedly wrongfully detained from plaintiff. Said patterns had at one time been partnership property of the plaintiff and defendant which were used to manufacture various parts of a tire truing machine.
Plaintiff and defendant had been partners for about eight months up until October 26, 1953, when the partnership was dissolved. The dissolution contract, confirming the division of 'moneys…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Frick-Reid Supply Co. v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Bank of Commerce of Ralston v. GaskillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Hargrove v. BourneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- U. C. Guss v. Federal Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Exxon Corporation v. Allen GannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Oklahoma Company v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Oklahoma Company v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Thompson v. PetersCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Oklahoma Company v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958