Legal Opinion

Hollister v. National Cash Register Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 1, 1916No. 6486PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from, District Court, Jefferson County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge. Action by the National Cash Register Company, a corporation, against S. L. Hollister. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

The plaintiff in error purchased from the defendant in error two cash regis ters for the agreed price of $760, as evidenced by a written contract executed on the 19th day of September, 1912, which, among other things, provided that the consideration therefor was to be $760, $30 of which was paid in cash, and $30 upon the arrival of the machines, whicn was subsequently paid, and $700 in monthly installments, and that the registers were to be delivered f. o. b. at Dayton, Ohio. And the contract contains a further provision :

“It is expressly agreed that this order shall ■ not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis Calyx Drill Co. v. MalloryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Dr. Koch Vegetable Tea Co. v. ShumannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Fruit Dispatch Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Stanford v. National Drill & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Miller v. Troy Laundry MacHinery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Mountcastle v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Wichita Flour Mills Co. v. Guymon Equity ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Curlee Clothing Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Rock v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API