Legal Opinion

Mamat v. United Fruit Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 23, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONGER, District Judge.

Motion granted and complaint dismissed on authority of Kraft v. A. H. Bull S. S. Co., D. C., 28 F.Supp. 437. The within case differs from Hunt v. United States, D.C., 17 F.Supp. 578, affirmed, 2 Cir., 91 F.2d 1014, certiorari denied 302 U.S. 752, 58 S.Ct. 271, 82 L.Ed. 581, in that the seaman in the Hunt case was hired as a member of the crew, paid weekly on a monthly basis, slept and ate on the vessel and was subject to discipline of the master and chief officer. In the within case the seaman was discharged as a member of the crew and was hired as a member of a “shore…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hunt v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
  2. Kraft v. A. H. Bull S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Leo A. Zientek v. Reading CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  2. Western Dairy Transport, LLC v. Vasquez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2014
  3. Reyes v. A. H. Bull S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  4. Bowers v. Kaiser Steel Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Garland v. Alaska Steamship Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API