Reyes v. A. H. Bull S. S. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
This action was brought on the assumption that “the plaintiff, Juan Reyes, was in the employ of the defendant, A. H. Bull Steamship Co., in the capacity of seaman”. Two claims are alleged in the complaint; (1) under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, for damages resulting from injuries plaintiff sustained while working on the vessel S. S. Hampden Sydney Victor, and (2) for maintenance and cure. The defendant denies that it employed plaintiff in any capacity and contends that he was employed by A. H. Bull & Co., Inc. (not the defendant) in a maintenance gang as a shore…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hagens v. United Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Kraft v. A. H. Bull S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Mamat v. United Fruit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Gonzalez v. Riverside & Fort Lee Ferry Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
3Cited by3 opinions
- Braniff v. Jackson Ave.-Gretna Ferry, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Leo A. Zientek v. Reading CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Braniff v. Jackson Ave.-Gretna Ferry, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960