Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Kaiser Steel Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1967No. 703PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

The superior court granted summary judgment in appellee’s favor by holding that as a matter of law appellant was neither a seaman nor a member of the crew of any vessel within the purview of the Jones Act.1 We affirm.

Appellant instituted an action in the superior court against appellee Kaiser Steel Corporation under the Jones Act. Appellant alleged that while employed by Kaiser he was

working as a seaman * * * by offloading steel girders from a barge owned by Foss Launch & Tug Company, In*849corporated, on navigable waters of the United States in Cook Inlet, Alaska. That…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Offshore Co. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. International Stevedoring Co. v. HavertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scott v. Briggs Way Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Scott v. Briggs Way Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API