Legal Opinion

Kraft v. A. H. Bull S. S. Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 26, 1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONGER, District Judge.

The libellant, Sigurd Kraft, claims to have been injured on the 21st day of April, 1938, while he was in the employ of the respondent; A. H. Bull Steamship Company, Inc., on the S. S. “Emilia”. He claims to have been employed as a seaman on said vessel and he sues under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, by which act seamen were given the benefits of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 51-59. He sues for personal injury, medical bills, maintenance and cure, etc. The respondent denies general liability and alleges a special defense that at the time of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  2. The Buena VenturaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1916
  3. The Bound BrookDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1906
  4. Seneca Washed Gravel Corporation v. McManigalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Braniff v. Jackson Ave.-Gretna Ferry, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  2. Hagens v. United Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. Mamat v. United Fruit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  4. Sullivan v. American President Lines, Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 1961
  5. Brannan v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API