Legal Opinion

Leo A. Zientek v. Reading Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 10, 1955No. 11381PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.

The chief question here is whether there was substantial evidence on which the jury could reasonably find that plaintiff-appellee was “a master or member of a crew of any vessel”. See McKie v. Diamond Marine Co., 5 Cir., 1953, 204 F.2d 132; Schantz v. American Dredging Co., 3 Cir., 1943, 138 F.2d 534; Carumbo v. Capo Cod S. S. Co., 1 Cir., 1941, 123 F.2d 991. If there was not, his exclusive remedy is under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 1 Swanson v. Marra Bros., 1946, 328 U.S. 1, 66 S.Ct. 869, 90 L.Ed. 1045, and this suit under the Jones Act…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Swanson v. Marra Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Norton v. Warner Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Desper v. Starved Rock Ferry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Braniff v. Jackson Ave.-Gretna Ferry, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  2. Nickolaus MacH v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  3. New York Life Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Mary Ann AtkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  4. Mietla v. WARNER COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Sullivan v. American President Lines, Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API