Legal Opinion

Nashua River Paper Co. v. Lindsay

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 27, 1924PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeCourcy, J.

This is an action to recover damages for breach of warranty of quality in the sale of Kraft pulp, delivered by the defendant to the plaintiff from June, 1917, to January, 1919. After the earlier decision of this court (reported in 242 Mass. 206), it was retried in the Superior Court by a judge sitting without a jury. The evidence before him, by agreement of parties, consisted of the report of the auditor, and the testimony and exhibits which were in evidence before the auditor. The plaintiff waived, counts 2 and 3. The judge found for the plaintiff in the sum of $40,860 and interest. The case…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Samuel v. Page-Storms Drop Forge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. P. K. Wilson & Son, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Nashua River Paper Co. v. LindsayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Rittenhouse, Winterson Auto. Co. v. KissnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  5. Trimount Lumber Co. v. MurdoughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Salmon Rivers Sportsman Camps, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Idzykowski v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Jamrog v. H. L. Handy Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Guthrie v. J. J. Newberry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Truslow Fulle, Inc. v. Diamond Bottling CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API