Legal Opinion
Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. P. K. Wilson & Son, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 17, 1923PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcLaughlin, J.
On October 3, 1919, the plaintiff and the individual defendants entered into a written contract (subsequently taken over by the defendant P. K. Wilson & Son, Inc.) for the manufacture, purchase and sale of automobile tires. Under the terms of the contract the plaintiff agreed to manufacture, according to certain specifications to be furnished by defendants, sell and deliver to them in New York city, automobile tires for export to the value of $300,000, with an option to defendants to increase the number of tires specified to the value of $750,000. In the event of such increase the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taylor v. . GoeletNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Strasbourger v. . LeerburgerNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Jacobson v. . Brooklyn Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Rubber Trading Co. v. Manhattan Rubber Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Estes v. . Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Marsh Wood Products Co. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- American Mfg. Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Nashua River Paper Co. v. LindsayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- DeForest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Triangle Radio Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Clarizo v. Spada Distributing Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.