Legal Opinion

Truslow Fulle, Inc. v. Diamond Bottling Corporation

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 5, 1930PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

The plaintiff in its complaint alleged that the defendant was indebted to it for certain merchandise, part of which had been delivered and the remainder of which was being held subject to the defendant’s orders. The defendant admitted that part of the merchandise had been delivered, but denied the rest of the complaint. It then pleaded a special defense the gist of which was that the merchandise consisted of a large quantity of crown caps to be used in its business of bottling and selling beverages, that the caps were defective and wholly useless for the purpose intended, that it had had to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wildman Mfg. Co. v. Davenport Hosiery MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Callies v. Reliance Laundry Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Nashua River Paper Co. v. LindsayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Nashua River Paper Co. v. LindsayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. Siller v. PhilipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Moosbrugger v. McGraw-Edison CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Guthrie v. J. J. Newberry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Reed v. BungerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  4. Sapiente v. WaltuchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  5. Whitfield v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API