Samuel v. Page-Storms Drop Forge Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Contract for breach of a contract to deliver light drop forge trimmings. Writ dated June 13, 1918. The action was tried in the Superior Court before Callahan, J., and there was a verdict for the plaintiffs. The defendant filed a proposed bill of exceptions. A motion by the plaintiffs to dismiss the bill was allowed. The defendant appealed. The case was submitted on briefs.
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of contract. In what purports to be the record as printed for our consideration are the amended declaration and the amended answer, the defendant’s draft of bill of exceptions not allowed, the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss those exceptions, alleging six different grounds together with supporting affidavit, and two other affidavits. Among the grounds set forth in the motion to dismiss the exceptions is that no notice of filing the exceptions was given to the plaintiff as required by the rules of court. On the back of the motion to dismiss is the indorsement “Motion allowed.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Atlantic Maritime Co. v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Gasquet v. LapeyreSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Bar Ass'n v. CaseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Churchill v. ChurchillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Check v. KaplanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Gallagher v. AtkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Harrington v. AndersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Sevigny's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.