Legal Opinion

Nashua River Paper Co. v. Lindsay

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 29, 1922PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of contract. The single count of the declaration now material alleges that the plaintiff, a paper manufacturer, bought of the defendant, a dealer, large quantities of pulp warranted to be of quality known as “No. 1. Kraft,” fit for the manufacture of “No. 1. Kraft” paper, relying upon the defendant’s skill and judgment to furnish such pulp, breach of that warranty as to quality and loss to the plaintiff. The answer sets up sale of pulp by sample without warranty, acceptance of same by the plaintiff acting independently of the defendant, and otherwise denies the allegations…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boyden v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Plummer v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Wylie v. MarinofskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Kershishian v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. Leary v. William G. Webber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Nashua River Paper Co. v. LindsayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Jamrog v. H. L. Handy Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Guthrie v. J. J. Newberry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Truslow Fulle, Inc. v. Diamond Bottling CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  5. Niagara Fire Insurance v. Lowell Trucking Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API