Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 9, 1966No. 40745PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

This action was commenced in May, 1963,. on behalf of the State of Oklahoma, by its Attorney General, as plaintiff, to recover the face amount of certain state warrants from the Liberty National Bank & Trust Company of Oklahoma City, as defendant. The defendant entered a demurrer to the plaintiff’s amended petition which was sustained by tiie trial court on October 11, 1963. The plaintiff declined to plead further and appealed to this court on the original record asserting that its amended petition alleged a cause of action. The parties will be referred to in this opinion by…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. National Metropolitan Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Wayne S. Marteney v. United States of America, C. M. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  3. Seitz v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Jordan Marsh Co. v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  5. People v. BenditCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Weston v. Acme Tool, IncorporatedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. Dean v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. United States v. Gregory Vincent HuntCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. Chastain v. ParkhurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  5. Russell v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API