Legal Opinion
Wayne S. Marteney v. United States of America, C. M. Henderson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 3, 1954No. 4869, 4870PublishedCited by 108 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
After having been sentenced and committed on pleas of guilty to separate counts of an indictment intending to charge violations of Section 2314, Title 18 U.S.C., the appellants separately moved to arrest the judgments on the grounds that the counts involved in the indictment failed to charge a federal offense. Treating the pleadings as motions to vacate under Section 2255, Title 28 U.S.C., the trial court concluded that the pertinent counts did charge a violation of Section 2314 and denied the motions. These separate appeals are from the judgments of sentence and the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Greathouse v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Kreuter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Barnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Pulliam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Gilbert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lawrence D. Coleman v. The Honorable Arthur L. Burnett, United States Magistrate for the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. ParnellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.