Legal Opinion
Seitz v. Jones
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 5, 1961No. 38631PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH, Justice.
The order of the trial court shows that demurrer was sustained because the petition showed on its face that the alleged cause of action stated did not accrue to the plaintiff within two years next before the commencement of the suit, and was therefore barred by the statute of limitations as provided in Title 12 O.S.A. § 95, subd. 3.
This action is based upon malpractice which allegedly occurred on January 13, 1952. The action was first' commenced in the district court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, on July 1, 1955, and was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on March 22, 1957, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Rosane v. SengerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
- Morrison v. ActonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Perrin v. RodriguezLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Bowman v. McPheetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gaddis v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.