Legal Opinion

Chastain v. Parkhurst

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 14, 1970No. 42401PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court sustaining demurrer of defendant (defendant in error herein) to plaintiffs’ petition. On appeal, reference to the parties will be made as they appeared in the trial court.

In their petition, plaintiffs alleged that two of the three defendants named therein had instituted an action against plaintiff Donald E. Chastain in the justice of the peace court over which the other named defendant, Aleñe Parkhurst, presided; that after summons allegedly had been issued, judgment was entered in such action and garnishment summons…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Board of Com'rs of Rogers CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Hoover v. Board of Com'rs of Garvin CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eckel v. AdairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Lay v. DwormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Radford-Shelton & Associates Dental Laboratory, Inc. v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Dean v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. Goforth v. Porter Medical Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API