Legal Opinion
People v. Bendit
California Supreme Court
Decided February 20, 1896No. Crim. No. 46PublishedCited by 45 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Edward A. Belcher, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
The defendant was convicted of forgery, and appeals from the judgment and from an ■order denying a new trial.
The information charges that appellant on July 30, 1894, did unlawfully, feloniously, falsely, etc., and with intent to defraud, “make and forge a certain instrument in writing, in words and figures following, to wit:
“ San Francisco, July 30, 1894.
“ G. W. Hume & Co.—William Cluff Company, wholesale grocers and provision dealers, 18 to 22 Front St-., corner Pine. Telephone 1819.
“ To balance.............
“ July '23. To bill rendered................... 15 50
“…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- State v. WillsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
3Cited by45 opinions
- Gilbert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State v. MarkWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Greathouse v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- International Union Bank v. National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- People v. CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.