Legal Opinion

McGrogan v. Till

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 24, 2001No. A-119 September Term 1999PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

LaVECCHIA, J.

This ease raises the question whether the shorter two-year statute of limitations under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2, instead of the six-year limitations period under N.J.S.A 2A:14-1 usually applied to legal-malpractice actions, should pertain to a claim of legal malpractice allegedly committed by defense counsel in the context of a criminal prosecution. The Appellate Division raised the question sua sponte. On this record, as the Appellate Division found, it matters not which statute of limitations applies because under either a two-year or six-year…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Montells v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  4. Conklin v. WeismanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  5. Olds v. DonnellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Saltiel v. GSI Consultants, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  2. Jerista v. MurraySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  3. Eduardo Cortez v. Joseph G. Gindhart, Esquire D/B/A Joseph G. Gindhart & Associates and Joseph G. Gindhart & AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
  4. Fox v. MillmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  5. Garcia v. Kozlov, Seaton, Romanini & Brooks, P.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API