McGrogan v. Till
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
LaVECCHIA, J.
This ease raises the question whether the shorter two-year statute of limitations under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2, instead of the six-year limitations period under N.J.S.A 2A:14-1 usually applied to legal-malpractice actions, should pertain to a claim of legal malpractice allegedly committed by defense counsel in the context of a criminal prosecution. The Appellate Division raised the question sua sponte. On this record, as the Appellate Division found, it matters not which statute of limitations applies because under either a two-year or six-year…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Montells v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Conklin v. WeismanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Olds v. DonnellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Saltiel v. GSI Consultants, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Jerista v. MurraySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Eduardo Cortez v. Joseph G. Gindhart, Esquire D/B/A Joseph G. Gindhart & Associates and Joseph G. Gindhart & AssociatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
- Fox v. MillmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- Garcia v. Kozlov, Seaton, Romanini & Brooks, P.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.