Hull v. Curtis Publishing Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Woodside, J.,
This is an appeal from the order and judgment of the lower court granting the defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto after the jury found for the plaintiffs in an action in trespass for invasion of the right of privacy. The lower court held that the action was barred by the statute of limitations.
The three plaintiffs are Philadelphia policemen who claim the defendant invaded their right of privacy by publishing a photograph of them in the issue of The Saturday Evening Post dated January 31, 1948.
The photograph about which plaintiffs complain had…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Roberson v. . Rochester Folding Box Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Sidis v. FR Pub. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Reed v. Real Detective Publishing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Smith v. DossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Albert Ettore v. Philco Television Broadcasting Corporation, Clayton, Inc. & Chesebrough Manufacturing Company, ConsolidatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Michael Meyers, Individually and as Representative of a Class v. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Association and Marion A. SteinbronnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Harris by Harris v. Easton Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Forster v. ManchesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Larsen v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Vogel v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.