Legal Opinion

Hull v. Curtis Publishing Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1956No. Appeals, 91, 92 and 93PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

This is an appeal from the order and judgment of the lower court granting the defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto after the jury found for the plaintiffs in an action in trespass for invasion of the right of privacy. The lower court held that the action was barred by the statute of limitations.

The three plaintiffs are Philadelphia policemen who claim the defendant invaded their right of privacy by publishing a photograph of them in the issue of The Saturday Evening Post dated January 31, 1948.

The photograph about which plaintiffs complain had…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Roberson v. . Rochester Folding Box Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Sidis v. FR Pub. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. Reed v. Real Detective Publishing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Smith v. DossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Albert Ettore v. Philco Television Broadcasting Corporation, Clayton, Inc. & Chesebrough Manufacturing Company, ConsolidatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Michael Meyers, Individually and as Representative of a Class v. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Association and Marion A. SteinbronnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. Harris by Harris v. Easton Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Forster v. ManchesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Larsen v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Vogel v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API