Legal Opinion

Weld v. Glaxo Wellcome Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 1, 2001PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of a Superior Court judge certifying a plaintiff class under Mass. R. Civ. P. 23, 365 Mass. 767 (1974). Three defendants, Glaxo Wellcome Inc. (Glaxo); Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. (Roche); and Warner-Lambert Company (Warner-Lambert), sought review of the order, pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 118, first par. A single justice of the Appeals Court denied the defendants’ petition, but granted them leave to appeal from his denial to the full court. We transferred the case here on our own motion. We affirm the class certification order.

1. Background. The…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Delvin C. Payton v. County of KaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Salvas v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Donovan v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  5. Mitchell v. Residential Funding Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API