Bernard v. Vatheuer
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
Plaintiff, Norman Bernard, a real estate salesman, sought damages for breach of an oral joint venture agreement between himself and defendant, Hans Vatheuer. Defendant moved for a directed verdict, alleging that plaintiff had failed to establish the joint venture agreement by “clear and convincing evidence.” Plaintiff responded that he must prove his case only by a preponderance of the evidence. The trial court denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and instructed the jury that:
“A party has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence any claim made in that party’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Albino v. AlbinoOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Stone-Fox, Inc. v. Vandehey Development Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Burke MacHinery Co. v. CopenhagenOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. McBrideOregon Supreme Court · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Weiner v. FleischmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Holdner v. HoldnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Hall v. TWS, INC.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Kuhl v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Nikolov v. Associated Environmental ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002