Legal Opinion

Bernard v. Vatheuer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1987No. CC A8310-06396; CA A36722; SC S33547PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

Plaintiff, Norman Bernard, a real estate salesman, sought damages for breach of an oral joint venture agreement between himself and defendant, Hans Vatheuer. Defendant moved for a directed verdict, alleging that plaintiff had failed to establish the joint venture agreement by “clear and convincing evidence.” Plaintiff responded that he must prove his case only by a preponderance of the evidence. The trial court denied defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and instructed the jury that:

“A party has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence any claim made in that party’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Albino v. AlbinoOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Stone-Fox, Inc. v. Vandehey Development Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Burke MacHinery Co. v. CopenhagenOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. McBrideOregon Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weiner v. FleischmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Holdner v. HoldnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Hall v. TWS, INC.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Kuhl v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Nikolov v. Associated Environmental ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API