Legal Opinion

Nikolov v. Associated Environmental Services

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 11, 2002No. 00-35635; D.C. No. CV-99-00141-ASPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM***

Plaintiffs-Appellants Nikolay N. Nioklov, individually and as personal representative of the estate of Nicola Nikolov, and-Gabriela N. Vladimirova (“the Nikolovs”) appeal the district court’s award of summary judgment for Associated Environmental Services and two of its principals, Kevin M. Wilkerson and James Lacher (collectively “AES”). We affirm.

As our subject matter jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship, state substantive law controls. See Torre v. Brickey, 278 F.3d 917, 919 (9th Cir.2002). The district court’s ruling on a summary judgment motion is reviewed de…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hansen v. Abrasive Engineering & Manufacturing, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Howland v. Iron Fireman Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Robert C. Torre Sherrill M. Polk v. James R. Brickey, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sprint Communications Co. v. Western Innovations, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API