Legal Opinion
North v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 9, 2015No. 13-1015 CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Civilian Pay; Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) (2012); Affirmative Defense of a “Factor Other Than Sex”; Agency Policy Allows Starting Pay Above Minimum If Applicant Has Superior Qualifications and Would Forfeit Pay to Enter Federal Employment.
OPINION
Bush, Senior Judge.
This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). These motions have been fully briefed, and oral argument was neither requested by the parties nor deemed necessary by the court. For the reasons set forth below, the court…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Boyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022