Legal Opinion
Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 30, 2011No. Nos. 09-844C, 10-741CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (“Sikorsky”) holds a number of contracts to provide aircraft and spare parts to the United States government. On December 11, 2008, an administrative contracting officer issued a final decision demanding that Sikorsky pay the government approximately $80 million premised on the contention that Sikorsky had improperly allocated certain overhead costs to its government contracts. Sikorsky brought an action on that claim in a eom.1 plaint filed with the court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(2) and 41 U.S.C. § 7104(b) on December 8,…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- K-Con Building Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Magnus Pacific Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.