Legal Opinion

Waggoner v. Ohio Central Railroad

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 4, 2007No. 2:06-cv-0250PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KEMP, United States Magistrate Judge.

Following the preliminary pretrial conference, the Court issued a scheduling order which, among other dates, established May 1, 2007 as the date by which defendant Ohio Central Railroad was required to disclose its expert witnesses. On April 30, 2007, Ohio Central filed a motion to extend that deadline for twenty-eight days. The motion has been opposed. The Court held a status conference on the motion and, in addition, plaintiff filed a reply memorandum. For the following reasons, the motion will be granted in part.

In its motion, Ohio Central argued…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shumaker v. WestDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2000
  2. Furlong v. Circle Line Statue of Liberty Ferry, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Diaz v. Con-Way Truckload, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
  2. Rivera-Mercado v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
  3. Aubri Vahai v. Ryan GertschWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Diane O’Neil v. Somatics, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
  5. Adetula v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API