Legal Opinion

Adetula v. United Parcel Service

District Court, D. Utah

Decided October 16, 2024No. 2:18-cv-00612Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION ADEMOLA ADETULA; and HOMER STRICKLAND, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ Plaintiffs, RULE 37 MOTION TO COMPEL RULE 35 EXAMINATIONS (DOC. NO. 324) v. Case No. 2:18-cv-00612 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.; UNITED PARCEL SERVICE GENERAL District Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. SERVICES CO.; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg Defendants. Ademola Adetula and Homer Strickland brought this consolidated action against their former employers, United Parcel Service, Inc., and United Parcel…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. John P. Miksis v. Henry L. Howard and Schneider National Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Diaz v. Con-Way Truckload, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
  4. Waggoner v. Ohio Central RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API