Legal Opinion

Diane O’Neil v. Somatics, LLC

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided September 22, 2023No. 20-cv-175-PBPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Diane O’Neil v. Case No. 20-cv-175-PB Opinion No.

2023 DNH 117

Somatics, LLC ORDER Defendant Somatics, LLC has filed a motion based on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35 to compel a mental examination of plaintiff Diane O’Neil. O’Neil asks me to deny the motion because Somatics, without good cause, waited more than a year after the expert disclosure deadline had passed to request the examination. I. ANALYSIS Rule 35 authorizes a court to order a party to submit to a mental or physical examination. The order “may be made only on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Faigin v. Kelly & CarucciCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
Tower Ventures, Inc. v. City of WestfieldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
Macaulay v. AnasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
John Real v. William T. HoganCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
Diaz v. Con-Way Truckload, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

O'Neil v. Somatics, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023