Legal Opinion

Gilles v. Department of Human Resources Development

California Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1974No. Sac. 7986PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*316Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

Unemployment Insurance Code section 1375 permits the state to recover an overpayment of unemployment benefits from a claimant unless such “recovery would be against equity and good conscience.” In holding plaintiffs liable for overpayments, however, the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board has ruled that recoupment of an overpayment, rendered after the claimant has received timely notice that he might be required to return it, never violates equity and good conscience. In this case we hold that the board erroneously interpreted section 1375; the broad language of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. California Department of Human Resources Development v. JavaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Gibson v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. Centr-O-MartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Jacobs v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Halbert's Lumber, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Lentz v. McMahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Gary L. QUINLIVAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Duenas-Rodriguez v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API